Jeep Brand Shoes Wear Less Than 1 Months' Quality Problems.

Recently, Mr. Xiao, a consumer in Beijing, complained to the newspaper that in November 2011, when he bought the Jeep brand shoes at the BeiJing Capital Airport T3 terminal, he had been wearing it for less than 1 months, and there was a quality problem.

During the consultation process, Mr. Xiao found that the manufacturer labeled the "problem shoes" label denied that the product was from its own factory.

It's been 8 months now, and the Jeep store has been using labels containing the manufacturer's information.

Mr. Shaw therefore questioned the sale of Jeep shoes at Jeep store of BeiJing Capital Airport T3 terminal, which was suspected of counterfeiting manufacturers.

In April 25th, according to Mr. Xiao, according to the location of the producer of the Jeep leather shoes label, which is located at the second industrial zone of Tanzhou Town, Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province, he reflected the quality of leather shoes to the "12365" complaint center of the Guangdong Quality Supervision Bureau. The complaint Center replied that Lu Mei Da had not delivered the goods to Beijing.

In order to further understand the quality of shoes, he delivered the "leather shoes" express mail to the Zhongshan Quality Supervision Bureau complaints center in June 17th.

In June 19th, Chen Xinxiong, managing director of Lu Mei Da, gave written proof to the Zhongshan Quality Supervision Bureau.

The proof shows: "verified, the complaint Jeep

It is not produced by our company, and our company is not responsible for this product. "

In July 17th, Chen Xinxiong further explained that the company had indeed worked with the Jeep shoe general agent, "Shenzhen Fries Investment Co., Ltd." (hereinafter referred to as Fries company), to produce Jeep shoes for Fries company, but half a year ago, they stopped the cooperation.

He also revealed that last year, some employees of the company went to Baotou, Inner Mongolia, and found that the sales of individual brand shops in Baotou were marked "Jeep brand shoes produced by Lu Mei Da company". After verification, these shoes are not products of Lu Mei Da company.

Later, they had repeatedly communicated with Forrest company on this occasion, hoping that they could change the correct product label as soon as possible.

But judging from the market situation, Forrest has not completely changed the label.

At 15 o'clock on July 16th, the Jeep brand store in the terminal of Beijing T3 terminal, 32 customers were choosing goods here.

The store sells Jeep brands including T-shirts, shirts, hats, belts, bags, shoes and so on.

There are dozens of styles of Jeep sandals and leather shoes in the shoe cabinet area on the right hand side of the door. All label manufacturers are all manufacturers of "Lu Mei Da Shoes Co., Ltd.".

At the same time, the name, address, telephone and other information of the Jeep shoe's general agent, "Shenzhen Forrest Investment Co., Ltd." are clearly marked on the signs.

Mr. Xiao bought the same Jeep shoes and sold them on the shelves.

According to shopkeeper Lu Haixia, the Jeep shoes sold at the T3 terminal of BeiJing Capital Airport are purchased by the Beijing Hao Jie Shun Trading Co., Ltd. and the general agent of Jeep shoes, after signing the agreement, and the source channels are regular.

For the sale of these shoes, the clerk said, "it's good to sell, many people drive here to buy".

For Lu Mei Da Shoes Co., Ltd. pointed out that "shoes are not their production" problem, including three staff members including Lu Haixia admitted that there is "shoe box label wrong facts, but there is no fake and shoddy products," and said that it has been reflected to the general agent Fries company. Fries has recently published an apology in the relevant newspapers.

In July 18th, Zhang Bing, general manager of Jeep, said: "we have apologized in a newspaper in July 9th that the label error was due to the printing error of the printing shop."

As for "why not change the label of the real manufacturer, who is the real producer," Zhang Bing said, "there is no need to reply directly now. Our company has legal documents."

For the "number of labels error," Zhang Bing said: "this is not very clear, we do not have to look at the statistics."

In July 25th, at the end of the press release, Lu Haixia told the label that the wrong shoes were "off the shelf" and said she was on leave.

Reporters found that China's relevant laws and regulations for product labeling are clearly stipulated, for the "use of others' factory name, factory site" also provides strict penalties.

The relevant provisions of the Chinese law stipulate that "forbid the origin of counterfeit products, forge or falsely use the names and sites of others, and the labels of products or their packages must be authentic, and the product names, factory names and site names specified in Chinese must be specified."

The regulations issued in 1997 also explicitly require that producers and sellers should not forge or falsely use the names and addresses of others, and shall not forge the origin, production date and expiration date of products.